Plastic packaging is the largest application for plastics in Europe, constituting 40% of the demand. When it becomes waste, only 40% of plastic packaging is recycled, while landfill, incineration and littering still represent its most common fates.
Although the European system of Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) should introduce a strong economic incentive to designs products and packaging for a circular economy, where material is re-used for a long time or recycled, the current system – according to Zero Waste Europe – fails to promote a zero waste design.
âEPR is an example on how the current economic incentives are not geared up to transition Europe to a circular economyâ Ariadna Rodrigo, product policy campaigner at Zero Waste Europe said. âWithin the current system of EPR, the products designed for recycling pay the same as those designed for landfill and incineration. This is not acceptable. EPR must reflect the waste hierarchy, where prevention, reuse and recycling are preferred options – in that very orderâ.
The report highlights the need for a system of modulated fees where the packaging designed for single use, incineration and landfill have higher fees than packaging designed for a circular economy.
